Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Australia criticized for exempting YouTube from under-16 social media ban


Leading by example, the Australian government passed a new bill last year, banning social media for everyone under 16 years old. No wonder, this ban has directly affected some of the top social media apps, including Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat. Now, the affected social media companies have criticized Australia for exempting YouTube from the under-16 social media ban.

TikTok, Meta, and Snapchat have criticized Australia for allowing kids to use YouTube

For the uninitiated, Australia initially had the plan to include YouTube as part of the social media ban. However, the passed law exempted it, as the Australian government deemed YouTube as an educational tool. The new law requires younger audiences to use YouTube as part of the family account that offers parental supervision rights.

Well, the fact that it’s still accessible to younger audiences has bothered the affected social media giants. In a submission to Australia’s Department of Communications, TikTok referred to YouTube’s exemption as a “sweetheart deal.” It further noted that YouTube’s exemption from Australia’s social media ban is “illogical, anti-competitive, and shortsighted.

On the other hand, Snapchat also criticized favoritism in the submission. It noted that “there must be a fair and impartial application of exclusions and all services should be held to the same standard.” Meta also said similar things in its submission regarding YouTube’s exemption from Australia’s under-sixteen social media ban. It also highlighted the younger audiences’ exposure to harmful content on YouTube.

In a blog post spotted by Reuters, the social media giant noted, “YouTube’s exemption is at odds with the purported reasons for the law and we call on the government to ensure equal application of the law across all social media services.

Time will tell if there’ll be any action

No doubt, the country’s latest move to curb the negative impact of social media on teens is commendable. However, workarounds like bypassing the age limit might pose a risk to the successful implementation of the new law. Furthermore, it’ll be interesting to see whether the complaints will lead Australia to lift YouTube’s exemption, eventually banning kids from using it.




Source link

Show Comments (0) Hide Comments (0)
Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *