Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Gender debate has changed but it’s not over yet


In nearly 25 years in daily journalism, I have never known another issue quite like it.

The arguments over sex and gender, trans and women’s rights have a passion, an anger and often a toxicity on both sides greater in their intensity than those over the Iraq war two decades ago, or Brexit in more recent years.

The abuse and vitriol that fly into my inbox every time I report on it are really quite something.

Last week’s decision by the Supreme Court was a landmark moment in this debate, providing the prism through which arguments will now be conducted.

But it won’t mark an end to those arguments, as a debate in the Commons on Tuesday evening proved.

The Conservative benches were packed and the Tory leader, Kemi Badenoch, took the unusual decision to answer for her party herself, something she would normally do in response to a statement from the prime minister rather than any other minister.

It was clear why she wanted to do so, displaying a greater confidence and sense of self-assurance than at any point since she became Conservative leader last autumn.

Some of her own MPs have grumbled privately that she has lacked oomph and cut-through in her opening months in the job.

She wasn’t lacking oomph this time, arguing the Supreme Court had vindicated what she had long argued, and pretty much saying “I told you so” to the Labour Party.

And yes, Labour in recent years, from Sir Keir Starmer down, have been in something of a bind on this issue, frequently tangled in anguish when confronted by questions such as “Can a woman have a penis?”

Many senior Labour figures regarded such questions as reductive and trivialising and wanted to be openly thoughtful about the rights of trans people.

They maintain, as do the Conservatives, that they still are, but it is also true that the Labour leadership’s position is the opposite of what it was.

The Supreme Court’s decision prompts lots of questions about the practicalities of what it concluded – for organisations large and small, public and private, trans people and others.

It is far from the end of those debates, but they will look and feel different, in politics and in wider society, after that landmark moment just before Easter.




Source link

Show Comments (0) Hide Comments (0)
Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *